<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 362 &#8211; 100+ Sites Reworked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked</link>
	<description>Follow Along On My IM Journey…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:35:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mikeman</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5114</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5079&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Bill&lt;/a&gt; 

Hey Bill, well...I can&#039;t really say anything without seeing what you did, you&#039;ve got to be the judge of whether your site is offering enough useful content...Just put yourself in the end user&#039;s shoes.

But I wouldn&#039;t wrap the text around the ads.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5080&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Dee&lt;/a&gt; 

Ya, I remember reading that too...it seems like the drop in my adsense is due to my first 170 odd sites taking a hit in impressions/eCPM...normally a backlink run via UAW fixes that up, but this latest run is to a lot of inner pages rather than the main domains and is taking longer for me to see results from.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5082&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Bryan&lt;/a&gt; 

Hey thanks Bryan, 

I said that I was providing 6 different backlink anchor text variations for each backlink so that Google will not see the backlinks as being suspicious.

And ya, the process of making the resource boxes is easy, just read the instructions on the screen, it&#039;s pretty straight forward.  

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5090&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@RichP&lt;/a&gt; 

Ya, wasn&#039;t something I could outsource as only I have access to my sites via XSite Pro.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5093&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Manny&lt;/a&gt; 

Just so that they&#039;re not so SEO oriented and so that they are more attractive looking to the end user.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5095&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Danny&lt;/a&gt; 

Nice :&gt;  

Well, I usually go by global, not local..just as long as the local is not too far down from the global.

If the local searches though are only 1,000 I would skip on those, unless the CPC is ridiculously high.

If I find something that had a global of 2,400 and local of 1,900, that&#039;s doable to me, I don&#039;t like going much lower than that.

But ya, if you find related keywords and they all look good, then make separate sites for each one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5079" rel="nofollow">@Bill</a> </p>
<p>Hey Bill, well&#8230;I can&#8217;t really say anything without seeing what you did, you&#8217;ve got to be the judge of whether your site is offering enough useful content&#8230;Just put yourself in the end user&#8217;s shoes.</p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t wrap the text around the ads.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5080" rel="nofollow">@Dee</a> </p>
<p>Ya, I remember reading that too&#8230;it seems like the drop in my adsense is due to my first 170 odd sites taking a hit in impressions/eCPM&#8230;normally a backlink run via UAW fixes that up, but this latest run is to a lot of inner pages rather than the main domains and is taking longer for me to see results from.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5082" rel="nofollow">@Bryan</a> </p>
<p>Hey thanks Bryan, </p>
<p>I said that I was providing 6 different backlink anchor text variations for each backlink so that Google will not see the backlinks as being suspicious.</p>
<p>And ya, the process of making the resource boxes is easy, just read the instructions on the screen, it&#8217;s pretty straight forward.  </p>
<p><a href="#comment-5090" rel="nofollow">@RichP</a> </p>
<p>Ya, wasn&#8217;t something I could outsource as only I have access to my sites via XSite Pro.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5093" rel="nofollow">@Manny</a> </p>
<p>Just so that they&#8217;re not so SEO oriented and so that they are more attractive looking to the end user.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5095" rel="nofollow">@Danny</a> </p>
<p>Nice :>  </p>
<p>Well, I usually go by global, not local..just as long as the local is not too far down from the global.</p>
<p>If the local searches though are only 1,000 I would skip on those, unless the CPC is ridiculously high.</p>
<p>If I find something that had a global of 2,400 and local of 1,900, that&#8217;s doable to me, I don&#8217;t like going much lower than that.</p>
<p>But ya, if you find related keywords and they all look good, then make separate sites for each one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5107</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 04:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5107</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5100&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Bryan&lt;/a&gt; 
No worries - Dr. Noel&#039;s UAW platform is pretty amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5100" rel="nofollow">@Bryan</a><br />
No worries &#8211; Dr. Noel&#8217;s UAW platform is pretty amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5100</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5100</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5098&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@JamestheJust on Elance&lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks.  I should have RTFM a bit more on UAW :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5098" rel="nofollow">@JamestheJust on Elance</a><br />
Thanks.  I should have RTFM a bit more on UAW <img src='http://mikeiser.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 17:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5082&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Bryan&lt;/a&gt; 
UAW&#039;s site has an incredible spinner on it.  Makes all of this moot, it takes 20 min if you&#039;re a cadaver and brainless to make over 2k unique resource boxes.  Literally, it took me 5 mins to max out their resource box file.

It&#039;s an amazing platform as far as ease of use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5082" rel="nofollow">@Bryan</a><br />
UAW&#8217;s site has an incredible spinner on it.  Makes all of this moot, it takes 20 min if you&#8217;re a cadaver and brainless to make over 2k unique resource boxes.  Literally, it took me 5 mins to max out their resource box file.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an amazing platform as far as ease of use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5095</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 15:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5095</guid>
		<description>I just made my first xfactor type site a week ago. Yesterday it made $3.07. Thanks for your blog… it gave me some of the motivation I needed.

I, also, had a question.  I recently found a micro niche for: 
brand red widgets.. which has strong local searches

but... 
brand blue widgets
brand green widgets
brand black widgets

are also available, but with substantially smaller local searches (around 1,000 each).

Would you build the main one, and then make the other colors pages of the main one?

Or build them all separately?

Thanks!

feel free to email me too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just made my first xfactor type site a week ago. Yesterday it made $3.07. Thanks for your blog… it gave me some of the motivation I needed.</p>
<p>I, also, had a question.  I recently found a micro niche for:<br />
brand red widgets.. which has strong local searches</p>
<p>but&#8230;<br />
brand blue widgets<br />
brand green widgets<br />
brand black widgets</p>
<p>are also available, but with substantially smaller local searches (around 1,000 each).</p>
<p>Would you build the main one, and then make the other colors pages of the main one?</p>
<p>Or build them all separately?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>feel free to email me too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5093</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5093</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike

Sorry can I ask why you are changing titles? Is that to make them less aggressive? or something else?

Thanks

Manny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike</p>
<p>Sorry can I ask why you are changing titles? Is that to make them less aggressive? or something else?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Manny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichP</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5090</link>
		<dc:creator>RichP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 10:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5090</guid>
		<description>Nice.  Yep I&#039;ve got a few hundred titles that need redoing too.. although I think this is going to be an outsourced job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  Yep I&#8217;ve got a few hundred titles that need redoing too.. although I think this is going to be an outsourced job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5082</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5082</guid>
		<description>Great blog and excellent job on your Adsense accomplishments, Mike.  I&#039;ve found your blog to be very informative and I am currently implementing the back linking strategy you discuss here into my SEO.  

I have a question for Mike (or the experts on this site) about UAW resource boxes.  I&#039;ve outsourced and received 30 separate articles from Human Rewriter (i agree with everyone, their service is badass) to be used with my first UAW run for 10 domains.  Before I can proceed I obviously need resource boxes. What I am wondering is what is the process to take an &quot;original&quot; resource box I write to 1,000+ variations?  I see on your readme you are spinning your keywords 6x.  What does that mean exactly and what software do you use to do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog and excellent job on your Adsense accomplishments, Mike.  I&#8217;ve found your blog to be very informative and I am currently implementing the back linking strategy you discuss here into my SEO.  </p>
<p>I have a question for Mike (or the experts on this site) about UAW resource boxes.  I&#8217;ve outsourced and received 30 separate articles from Human Rewriter (i agree with everyone, their service is badass) to be used with my first UAW run for 10 domains.  Before I can proceed I obviously need resource boxes. What I am wondering is what is the process to take an &#8220;original&#8221; resource box I write to 1,000+ variations?  I see on your readme you are spinning your keywords 6x.  What does that mean exactly and what software do you use to do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 23:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5080</guid>
		<description>Hello Mike,
I did read on griz&#039;s site how going back and reworking previous content can negatively impact your rankings, though it&#039;s only temporarily and don&#039;t remember him saying for how long.  I think it was griz&#039;s site i read it on or eithr Lisa Parmsley, not sure.
anyways good look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mike,<br />
I did read on griz&#8217;s site how going back and reworking previous content can negatively impact your rankings, though it&#8217;s only temporarily and don&#8217;t remember him saying for how long.  I think it was griz&#8217;s site i read it on or eithr Lisa Parmsley, not sure.<br />
anyways good look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-362-100-sites-reworked/comment-page-1#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=1239#comment-5079</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t that many sites yet, so I think I&#039;ll just leave them alone for a while at least. The new ones I have been wrapping the content around the &#039;adsense&#039; ads and maybe adding an extra paragraph plus keeping the graphics away from the adsense ads.

Better?  Any comment?

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t that many sites yet, so I think I&#8217;ll just leave them alone for a while at least. The new ones I have been wrapping the content around the &#8216;adsense&#8217; ads and maybe adding an extra paragraph plus keeping the graphics away from the adsense ads.</p>
<p>Better?  Any comment?</p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

