<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 308 &#8211; Domain Registrations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations</link>
	<description>Follow Along On My IM Journey…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:35:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mikeman</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5151&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tim&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5153&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Kenneth&lt;/a&gt;

Ya, it&#039;s going to be a pain to convert 300+ sites over to another program though :/

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5154&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@DC&lt;/a&gt;

That&#039;s correct..

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5164&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@James the Just on Elance&lt;/a&gt;

And ya, you can put in 3 links if you want and see if that works out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5151" rel="nofollow">@Tim</a></p>
<p><a href="#comment-5153" rel="nofollow">@Kenneth</a></p>
<p>Ya, it&#8217;s going to be a pain to convert 300+ sites over to another program though :/</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5154" rel="nofollow">@DC</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s correct..</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5164" rel="nofollow">@James the Just on Elance</a></p>
<p>And ya, you can put in 3 links if you want and see if that works out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James the Just on Elance</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>James the Just on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5154&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@DC&lt;/a&gt;
Not to steal MikeMan&#039;s thunder, but I just did 4 runs the other day and you can get 3 links - one in the body, under the fold, and 2 in the resource, but the trouble is that not all directories will take the 3rd link.

I&#039;m running a bit of an experiment here, but UAW did approve them - it&#039;s the individual blogs and directories that I&#039;m not sure about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5154" rel="nofollow">@DC</a><br />
Not to steal MikeMan&#8217;s thunder, but I just did 4 runs the other day and you can get 3 links &#8211; one in the body, under the fold, and 2 in the resource, but the trouble is that not all directories will take the 3rd link.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running a bit of an experiment here, but UAW did approve them &#8211; it&#8217;s the individual blogs and directories that I&#8217;m not sure about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3145</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3145</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-5139&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5139&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mikeman&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5134&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@DC&lt;/a&gt;
Hey DC…the UAW article must be related to/in the same niche as at least 1 of the 2 sites you’re linking to in the resource box..the other site being linked to can be on something completely different, so there’s no problems backlinking all of my sites.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I guess I got confused about the amount of sites (1) UAW run will link to. I thought (1) UAW run was providing links to 1-25 sites but in actuality (1) UAW run is to linking to only (2) sites with anchor text varied 6x.

So if I was to run UAW on 10 sites, I&#039;ll have to 5 different UAW runs (1 run per 2 site). Correct me if I&#039;m wrong...thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-5139"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-5139" rel="nofollow">Mikeman</a> :</strong></p>
<p><a href="#comment-5134" rel="nofollow">@DC</a><br />
Hey DC…the UAW article must be related to/in the same niche as at least 1 of the 2 sites you’re linking to in the resource box..the other site being linked to can be on something completely different, so there’s no problems backlinking all of my sites.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess I got confused about the amount of sites (1) UAW run will link to. I thought (1) UAW run was providing links to 1-25 sites but in actuality (1) UAW run is to linking to only (2) sites with anchor text varied 6x.</p>
<p>So if I was to run UAW on 10 sites, I&#8217;ll have to 5 different UAW runs (1 run per 2 site). Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong&#8230;thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3144</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3144</guid>
		<description>WinSCP is a great alternative to FileZilla.  Also, if you&#039;re on accounts that support SSH (such as a VPS), you should look at SFTP (FTP over SSH, if you like).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WinSCP is a great alternative to FileZilla.  Also, if you&#8217;re on accounts that support SSH (such as a VPS), you should look at SFTP (FTP over SSH, if you like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3143</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-5132&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5132&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mikeman&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5123&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Tim&lt;/a&gt;
Hmm, I’m using Filezilla, not sure how to encrypt that..
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It doesn&#039;t look like FileZilla can encrypt your data file.

You might want to take a look at this:

hxxp://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/09/01/beware-filezilla-doesnt-protect-your-ftp-passwords/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-5132"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-5132" rel="nofollow">Mikeman</a> :</strong><br />
<a href="#comment-5123" rel="nofollow">@Tim</a><br />
Hmm, I’m using Filezilla, not sure how to encrypt that..
</p></blockquote>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like FileZilla can encrypt your data file.</p>
<p>You might want to take a look at this:</p>
<p>hxxp://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2009/09/01/beware-filezilla-doesnt-protect-your-ftp-passwords/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikeman</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5133&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@James the Just on Elance&lt;/a&gt;
:&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5134&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@DC&lt;/a&gt;

Hey DC...the UAW article must be related to/in the same niche as at least 1 of the 2 sites you&#039;re linking to in the resource box..the other site being linked to can be on something completely different, so there&#039;s no problems backlinking all of my sites.

&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5138&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Adam&lt;/a&gt;

Hey Adam, finding related keywords that also match the criteria (2.4k+ exact searches &amp; a minimum of 2 PR 0&#039;s N/A&#039;s on the front page etc..) become a new domain keyword for sure!  This is how I find A LOT of my sites.

And for inner page keywords, I don&#039;t think about them too much, selecting them is a very FAST process..if i can&#039;t find any that meet my criteria I use for my main domain keyword, I don&#039;t sweat it...I&#039;ll often go for keywords with only 1 PR 0 or PR N/A...sometimes keywords that have no PR 0&#039;s or N/A&#039;s if I really have no options...

The reason for that is inner pages aren&#039;t what bring in the money, it&#039;s the main domain keyword that brings in the vast majority..85%+ usually...

And for the inner page keywords, the domain being available or not means nothing, you&#039;re not buying those domains you&#039;re just building them as inner pages on your site...

Most inner pages are less than 2.4k exact searches as if they were equal to or more than that, you&#039;d make them into a site of it&#039;s own..

The only exception is if the keyword has all top level domains taken, then that can become an inner page keyword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5133" rel="nofollow">@James the Just on Elance</a><br />
:></p>
<p><a href="#comment-5134" rel="nofollow">@DC</a></p>
<p>Hey DC&#8230;the UAW article must be related to/in the same niche as at least 1 of the 2 sites you&#8217;re linking to in the resource box..the other site being linked to can be on something completely different, so there&#8217;s no problems backlinking all of my sites.</p>
<p><a href="#comment-5138" rel="nofollow">@Adam</a></p>
<p>Hey Adam, finding related keywords that also match the criteria (2.4k+ exact searches &#038; a minimum of 2 PR 0&#8217;s N/A&#8217;s on the front page etc..) become a new domain keyword for sure!  This is how I find A LOT of my sites.</p>
<p>And for inner page keywords, I don&#8217;t think about them too much, selecting them is a very FAST process..if i can&#8217;t find any that meet my criteria I use for my main domain keyword, I don&#8217;t sweat it&#8230;I&#8217;ll often go for keywords with only 1 PR 0 or PR N/A&#8230;sometimes keywords that have no PR 0&#8217;s or N/A&#8217;s if I really have no options&#8230;</p>
<p>The reason for that is inner pages aren&#8217;t what bring in the money, it&#8217;s the main domain keyword that brings in the vast majority..85%+ usually&#8230;</p>
<p>And for the inner page keywords, the domain being available or not means nothing, you&#8217;re not buying those domains you&#8217;re just building them as inner pages on your site&#8230;</p>
<p>Most inner pages are less than 2.4k exact searches as if they were equal to or more than that, you&#8217;d make them into a site of it&#8217;s own..</p>
<p>The only exception is if the keyword has all top level domains taken, then that can become an inner page keyword.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3141</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3141</guid>
		<description>@Mikeman

And also... do you not need to worry about there being a domain available for inner keywords? I.E - use terms that are still high in search volume but the domain has been taken?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mikeman</p>
<p>And also&#8230; do you not need to worry about there being a domain available for inner keywords? I.E &#8211; use terms that are still high in search volume but the domain has been taken?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>@Mikeman

Thanks a lot for this info. I am 100% this has been covered before, but please could you point me to a post that discusses your criteria for inner keywords (i.e will you take lesser search count etc).

I have found a large number of related keywords with domains and aren&#039;t sure whether to make my own fresh sites with them or add them as inner keyword pages. If you find a good keyword with a domain, do you ALWAYS make it a site? I would imagine so.

In which case, will you settle for less searches, harder to rank pages etc for inners?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mikeman</p>
<p>Thanks a lot for this info. I am 100% this has been covered before, but please could you point me to a post that discusses your criteria for inner keywords (i.e will you take lesser search count etc).</p>
<p>I have found a large number of related keywords with domains and aren&#8217;t sure whether to make my own fresh sites with them or add them as inner keyword pages. If you find a good keyword with a domain, do you ALWAYS make it a site? I would imagine so.</p>
<p>In which case, will you settle for less searches, harder to rank pages etc for inners?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DC</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Yo Mikeman! I got a question regarding your UAW run.

You stated that you rewrite (1) article 3x, then you&#039;ll link (1) resource box to (2) sites varying the anchor text of each link 6x and you do these UAW batch runs for about 1-25 sites. Do the article has to be related to the sites you link too? I&#039;m figuring it&#039;s not because you could have a lot of different niche sites in a batch of 25 sites, unless you group them as so before a UAW run?

Sorry for the long question, I&#039;m going back through your Q&amp;A, jotting down notes before I start my own journey to 100/day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo Mikeman! I got a question regarding your UAW run.</p>
<p>You stated that you rewrite (1) article 3x, then you&#8217;ll link (1) resource box to (2) sites varying the anchor text of each link 6x and you do these UAW batch runs for about 1-25 sites. Do the article has to be related to the sites you link too? I&#8217;m figuring it&#8217;s not because you could have a lot of different niche sites in a batch of 25 sites, unless you group them as so before a UAW run?</p>
<p>Sorry for the long question, I&#8217;m going back through your Q&amp;A, jotting down notes before I start my own journey to 100/day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James the Just on Elance</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations/comment-page-1#comment-3138</link>
		<dc:creator>James the Just on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/day-307-domain-registrations#comment-3138</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5132&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mikeman&lt;/a&gt;
Thanks, MikeMan.  The fictitious fella thanks you...er, would, if he/she was actually a real person.  I&#039;ll pretend this person thanked you.

And for clarifying the rest re: the inner pages.  Just want to be sure I nail it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-5132" rel="nofollow">@Mikeman</a><br />
Thanks, MikeMan.  The fictitious fella thanks you&#8230;er, would, if he/she was actually a real person.  I&#8217;ll pretend this person thanked you.</p>
<p>And for clarifying the rest re: the inner pages.  Just want to be sure I nail it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

