<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 143 &#8211; Adsense Sniper 17 &amp; 18</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikeiser.com/day-143-adsense-sniper-17-18/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-143-adsense-sniper-17-18</link>
	<description>Follow Along On My IM Journey…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:35:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-143-adsense-sniper-17-18/comment-page-1#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=471#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the recap! I figured it was something like that! I like .nets. They have done well for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the recap! I figured it was something like that! I like .nets. They have done well for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikeman</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-143-adsense-sniper-17-18/comment-page-1#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=471#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1777&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Sara&lt;/a&gt;

Oh, I&#039;ve been down that road before...I wrote about it in the past here on my blog.

When I was doing my CB snipers, I had 22 .orgs which had a corresponding .net still available.  I bought them all and developed them all.  What I found was that most of the time the newer .net&#039;s kicked out the .org&#039;s...they rarely shared the first page together.

This is kinda bad in a way because if someone wants to steal your niche and there are slots open, they very well can...in my experience the newer site kicks out the older one.  So your best bet if you don&#039;t want that to be an issue is to really backlink up your site..or just make so many sites that if that happens you don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1777" rel="nofollow">@Sara</a></p>
<p>Oh, I&#8217;ve been down that road before&#8230;I wrote about it in the past here on my blog.</p>
<p>When I was doing my CB snipers, I had 22 .orgs which had a corresponding .net still available.  I bought them all and developed them all.  What I found was that most of the time the newer .net&#8217;s kicked out the .org&#8217;s&#8230;they rarely shared the first page together.</p>
<p>This is kinda bad in a way because if someone wants to steal your niche and there are slots open, they very well can&#8230;in my experience the newer site kicks out the older one.  So your best bet if you don&#8217;t want that to be an issue is to really backlink up your site..or just make so many sites that if that happens you don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://mikeiser.com/day-143-adsense-sniper-17-18/comment-page-1#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikeiser.com/?p=471#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>Question for you - do you ever buy up all the available domains for the same keyword? The keyword I discovered that has been performing well still has the .org available and I am really tempted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question for you &#8211; do you ever buy up all the available domains for the same keyword? The keyword I discovered that has been performing well still has the .org available and I am really tempted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

